Before the
National Telecommunications and Information Administration
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Washington, DC 20230
|
In the Matter of Request for Comments on Deployment of Broadband Networks and Advanced Telecommunications |
) ) ) ) ) |
Docket
No. 011109273-1273-01 |
The
National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. (NECA)[1]
submits these comments in response to the NTIA’s Notice of Inquiry (NOI) in the
above-captioned proceeding.[2] The NOI requests comment on the status of
broadband deployment in America. The
NTIA asks interested parties to comment on a number of issues, including:
supply and demand for broadband services; and the technical, economic, or
regulatory barriers to broadband deployment.
In
specific, the NOI seeks comment on the current status of supply and demand for
broadband services. NECA submits for
the record in this proceeding summaries of two extensive studies of the costs
of broadband deployment in rural areas.
These studies focus on areas of network
infrastructure that are of particular expense and concern to rural telephone
companies seeking to offer broadband services using digital subscriber line[3]
(DSL) technology: the "last mile" and the "middle mile."[4]
NECA has an extensive background in collecting and analyzing
data from rural telephone companies.
Biennially, the efforts of the 1,100 mostly small, rural telephone
companies that participate in NECA's traffic sensitive (TS) pool are published
in NECA's Access Market Survey.[5] The most recently published Access Market
Survey concluded that small companies have higher risks resulting from: 1) the
need to recover higher deployment costs associated with serving demand in areas
where customers are widely dispersed over large geographic areas; 2) changing
network standards; and 3) continuing regulatory uncertainty.
Building on the knowledge acquired through the Access
Market Survey, NECA focused directly on broadband deployment in its "last
mile" study, which was completed in June 2000. NECA’s "last mile" cost study found that the estimated
cost of upgrading 3.3 million rural study area lines amounted to $10.9 billion
dollars. Approximately half of that
total was associated with upgrading lines serving customers situated in areas
that are either very remote or situated in difficult terrain.
NECA's Middle Mile Cost Study, completed in the fall of
2001, focuses on the cost of transporting Internet traffic from an Internet
Service Provider (ISP) operating in a rural telephone company's territory to an
Internet Backbone Provider (IBP). This
section of transport is commonly referred to as the "middle
mile." In NECA's Middle Mile
study, member companies indicated that long distances to Internet backbone
nodes and lack of market size create revenue shortfalls that make it
uneconomical for ISPs to do business in rural communities.
NECA’s Middle Mile study showed, for example, that 55% of
rural telephone company switches are more than 70 miles away from an IBP node,
and that 10% are more than 200 miles away.
Costs per line for transporting high-speed traffic to these nodes range
from $17 to as much as $8,754 per line.
Because of this high transport cost, high speed services, if offered in rural areas at all, generally
incur revenue losses for providers.
Paradoxically, these losses increase as market penetration increases because operating margins remain negative
at higher levels of demand. These
obstacles make it uneconomical for rural LECs to provide broadband service to
many of their customers.
The NECA member companies represented in these studies
currently account for more than 49 percent of the lines served by rural
telephone companies as defined by the Federal Communications Commission. They serve more than 30 percent of all lines
that are classified as rural, regardless of telephone company size. NECA's studies clearly indicate that many
customers in rural areas will be left unserved through market forces alone.
CONCLUSION
Small, rural LECs face tough challenges posed by the high
cost of the "last mile" and
the "middle mile" in the territories in which they are situated. NECA's Last Mile and Middle Mile studies
provide valuable insight into the special circumstances and challenges rural
companies face in making broadband deployment economically feasible. The studies show that there are two aspects
of the problem: the cost of deploying broadband-capable services to individual
homes and businesses in sparsely-populated rural areas, and the cost of
connecting rural areas to the Internet “backbone.” As NTIA moves forward with its analysis, it should give
consideration both to the “last mile” and “middle mile” portions of the
broadband deployment challenge.
Respectfully submitted,
NATIONAL EXCHANGE
CARRIER ASSOCIATION, Inc.
By: s\ Gina Harrison
December 19, 2001 Gina Harrison
Colin Sandy (admission pending)
Its Attorneys
2120 L Street NW, Suite 650
Washington, DC 20037
(202) 263-1654
[1] NECA is a non-stock corporation
in which all incumbent local telephone companies are members, as mandated by
rules of the Federal Communications Commission. Formed in 1983 to
administer the FCC's access charge plan following the breakup of AT&T and
the Bell System, NECA today provides a wide range of services to the
telecommunications industry. NECA has
staff with expertise in telecommunications regulation, the administration of
complex public policy programs, and the collection, analysis and forecasting of
industry data.
[2] Notice, Request for
Comments on Deployment of Broadband Networks and Advanced Telecommunications,
Docket No. 011109273-1273-01, 66 Fed. Reg. 57941 (2001)(NOI).
[3] NTIA itself has found that
only digital subscriber line technology holds the prospect of delivering
broadband beyond the rural town limit. See United States
Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information
Administration & United States Department of Agriculture, Rural
Development and Rural Utilities Service Advanced Telecommunications in Rural
America: The Challenge of Bringing Broadband Service to All Americans (April 2000).
[4] A
summary of NECA's Last Mile study results, titled NECA Rural Broadband Cost
Study: Summary of Results, is attached as Appendix A. A summary of NECA's Middle Mile study,
titled NECA's Middle Mile Cost Study: Executive Summary, is attached as
Appendix B.