NTIA Report 03-404
RECEIVER SPECTRUM STANDARDS
Phase 1 - Summary of
Research into Existing Standards
Bernard Joiner

Donald
Evans, Secretary
Michael D Gallagher, Acting Assistant Secretary
for Communications and Information
NOVEMBER 2003
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 2 TECHNICAL BACKGROUND
Section 3 FEDERAL AGENCY
STANDARDS
3.1 National
Telecommunications And Information Administration (NTIA)
3.2 Federal
Communications Commission (FCC)
3.3 Department
Of Defense (DOD)
3.4 Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA)
Section 4 U.S. INDUSTRY
ASSOCIATION STANDARDS
4.1 Telecommunications
Industry Association (TIA)
4.2 Consumer
Electronics Association (CEA)
4.3 Radio
Technical Commission For Aeronautics (RTCA)
4.4 Radio
Technical Commission For Maritime Services (RTCM)
Section 5 INTERNATIONAL
STANDARDS
5.1 International
Telecommunications Union (ITU)
5.2 International
Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
5.3 European
Telecommunication Standard Institute (ETSI)
5.4 International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)
5.5 International
Maritime Organization (IMO)
Section 7 OBSERVATIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PHASE 2 STUDY
7.2 Recommendations
for Future Study
As part of the overall spectrum management process, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) have developed radio regulations to help ensure that the various radio services operate compatibly in the same environment without unacceptable levels of radio frequency interference. These regulations generally focus on sharing spectrum and the interfering potential of transmitters. Less attention has been given to the regulation of receiver parameters and the associated non-cochannel interference issues.
In recent years, there have been a growing number of cases of non-cochannel interference that has been caused by inadequate performance of receivers instead of by transmitter performance. One element in the prevention of non-cochannel interference is the design and use of quality receivers that are less susceptible to interference. Receivers are often vulnerable to interference from non-cochannel signals because of inadequate selectivity. This has resulted in complaints of interference, sometimes requiring legitimate transmitting stations to cease or limit their operation even when a poor performing receiver is mainly at fault. In addition to interference problems, the lack of receiver standards has hindered efficient management of the spectrum by putting restraints on adjacent channel assignments in many areas.
The objective of this task is to undertake a broad review of receiver spectrum standards to characterize their status and to explore needs and options for promoting the use of more interference-robust receivers. The first phase includes the identification of existing standards, both mandatory and voluntary. This report presents the results of this first phase. The second phase will examine the underlying requirements, assess trade-offs among potential regulatory approaches and develop appropriate recommendations.
With the exception of certain television services, the
FCC has not published receiver spectrum standards and has allowed the
marketplace to determine the appropriate receiver specifications. Realizing that poorly designed receivers can
cause interference and limit the number and type of transmitters that can
operate within a given environment, the FCC is now considering the adoption of
receiver standards. On
NTIA, on the other hand, has receiver spectrum standards for most Federal users of the radio spectrum. NTIA has taken the approach that, for Federal users, the performance of both the transmitter and the receiver should be regulated. This approach to management of the radio spectrum emphasizes prevention of interference and improved spectrum management. Federal agencies generally comply with the NTIA standards, with some agencies implementing even stricter standards.
Industry associations and standards setting bodies have published receiver spectrum standards for some radio services. Many manufacturers adhere to these standards in the interest of providing systems that perform adequately in adverse operational environments. However, few standards exist for many non-Federal services and frequency bands.
Many foreign countries have implemented receiver spectrum standards. Usually, rather than developing standards themselves, they adopt standards issued by the various international industry and inter-governmental associations.
The second phase of this study and follow-up work will include an examination of the need for standards, working with the FCC to establish standards or other means for preventing non-cochannel interference and promoting efficient use of the spectrum, updating the Federal standards in the NTIA manual, and the initiation of a program for greater promulgating emission characteristics in the Federal bands.
|
ADF |
Automatic
Direction Finding |
|
AGC |
Automatic Gain
Control |
|
AM |
Amplitude
Modulated |
|
CB |
Citizens Band |
|
CEA |
Consumer
Electronics Association |
|
CW |
Continuous Wave |
|
dB |
decibels |
|
dBm |
decibels above one
milliwatt |
|
dBW |
decibels above one
watt |
|
DME |
Distance Measuring
Equipment |
|
DOD |
Department of
Defense |
|
EIA |
Electronic
Industries Association |
|
EMC |
Electromagnetic
Capability |
|
ETSI |
Electronic
Telecommunications Standards Institute |
|
FAA |
Federal Aviation Administration |
|
FAR |
Federal Aviation
Regulation |
|
FCC |
Federal
Communications Commission |
|
FM |
Frequency
Modulation |
|
HF |
High Frequency (3
to 30 MHz) |
|
ICAO |
International
Civil Aviation Organization |
|
IEC |
International
Electrotechnical Commission |
|
IEEE |
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers |
|
ILS |
Instrument Landing
System |
|
IM |
Intermodulation |
|
IMO |
International
Maritime Organization |
|
ITU |
International
Telecommunications |
|
kHz |
Kilohertz |
|
kW |
Kilowatt |
|
MF |
Medium Frequency
(.3 to 3 MHz) |
|
MHz |
Megahertz |
|
MIL-STD |
Military Standard |
|
NDB |
Non-Directional
Beacon |
|
NTIA |
National
Telecommunications and Information Administration |
|
PCS |
Personal
Communications Service |
|
PM |
Phase Modulated |
|
RTCA |
Radio Technical
Commission for Aeronautics |
|
RTCM |
Radio Technical
Commission for Maritime Services |
|
SMR |
Specialized Mobile
Radio |
|
TIA |
Telecommunications
Industry Association |
|
TSO |
Technical Standard
Order |
|
UHF |
Ultra High
Frequency (300 to 3000 MHz) |
|
VHF |
Very High
Frequency (30 to 300 MHz) |
|
VOR |
VHF
Omni-directional Range |
|
µvolt |
Microvolt |
|
V/m |
Volts per meter |
Section 1
INTRODUCTION
As part of the overall spectrum management process, NTIA and the FCC have developed radio regulations to facilitate operation of various radio services in the same environment without unacceptable levels of radio interference. These regulations generally focus on sharing spectrum and the interfering potential of transmitters. Less attention has been given to the regulation of receiver parameters and the associated non-cochannel interference issues.
In recent years, there have been a number of cases of non-cochannel[1] interference that have been caused by the inadequate performance of receivers instead of by transmitter performance. One element in the prevention of non-cochannel interference and improvement in spectrum utilization efficiency is the design and use of receivers that are less susceptible to interference. Some of the reasons why these interference and efficiency problems are now becoming apparent may include:
1) continued dramatic increase in overall spectrum use;
2) mix of analog and digital technologies that have different spectral requirements, channel plans and interference suppression capabilities;
3) introduction of new services and systems without adopting standards needed for electromagnetic compatibility with incumbent services and systems;
4) design tradeoffs favoring inexpensive radio equipment rather than good equipment performance;
5) reduction or loss of previously available guard bands;
6) equipment manufacturers’ lack of knowledge of characteristics of equipment operating in the same or adjacent bands;
7) increased receiver front-end bandwidth associated with greater tuning range of certain receivers; and
8) different system channel plans in the same band e.g. specialized mobile radio (SMR) and public safety operations sharing the 800 MHz band.[2]
Receiver designs that do not take into adequate account the operational environment are often vulnerable to interference from non-cochannel signals because of inadequate dynamic range or selectivity within the Radio Frequency (RF) or Intermediate Frequency (IF) stages of the receiver. Some examples of interference due to inadequate receiver design that have been investigated by NTIA include the following:
1) Fixed-satellite service receiving earth stations that use low noise preamplifiers at the antenna and have little or no filtering prior to active components,[3]
2) Digital radio relay receivers that use low noise preamplifiers and have little or no filtering prior to active components,[4]
3) Unlicensed Part 15 receivers, such as garage door openers, that use very wide bandwidths,[5]
4) Analog television and other consumer receivers with generally very poor RF selectivity,[6] and
5) VHF maritime receivers with insufficient selectivity.[7]
In the U.S. regulatory environment, it sometimes is not clear whether interference problems resulting from design faults in the receiver are the responsibility of the receiver owner or the transmitter owner to resolve. Without standards, the quality of the receiver and its interference susceptibility is left to the buyer of a piece of radio equipment as an aspect of market-place choices. Nevertheless, user reaction to interference, in some cases public reaction, may place the onus on changing transmitter operations regardless of the actual cause of the interference.
The increased demands placed on the radio spectrum require effective spectrum management. Currently, efficient spectrum utilization is not achieved due to limitations on the assignment of adjacent or semi-adjacent channels in the same or nearby areas in some services. This results in many potential assignments being unavailable. One well-known example is the practice by the FCC not to assign adjacent analog television channels in the same area due to poor receiver selectivity. Had television receiver standards been implemented, this frequency assignment constraint would not have been necessary and there would have been adequate television channels to satisfy demand.[8]
In response to the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 and the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, NTIA identified a total of 255 MHz of Federal spectrum for reallocation to the private sector to provide additional spectrum for emerging telecommunications technologies and to help balance the Federal budget through subsequent auction of the identified bands.[9] Because of the large spectrum requirements of the Federal Government and the mandate to avoid excessive costs or serious degradation to Federal operations, most of these bands were identified with some degree of encumbrance. These encumbrances include continued Federal operations within certain bands at specific sites and continued Federal operations in adjacent bands. Introduction of new services and systems in the 17 bands identified for reallocation will open up a significant number of potential adjacent band interference problems. In the Spectrum Reallocation Final Report, NTIA recognized the potential problems and recommended that effective receiver standards, either regulatory or established by industry, be developed for new technologies operating in the reallocated bands adjacent to high-power Federal systems.[10]
Domestically, there has been no clear consensus regarding the best means to assure development and use of suitably designed receivers. Previously, the FCC declined to mandate standards for commercial receivers, stating that the pressures of the marketplace provide the best means to accomplish this goal. In some commercial areas, such as Personal Communications Service (PCS), system designers have successfully applied receiver standards. In other areas, especially where the consumers have access to products that achieve significantly different levels of performance, the lack of known standards and compliance may make it difficult for them to make an informed choice.
The objective of Phase 1 of this task was to undertake a broad review of receiver spectrum standards to characterize their status, both domestically and internationally. This Report presents the results of this phase.
Phase 2 will explore various alternatives and options to promote the use of receivers that are compatible with their operating environment, especially in commercial bands adjacent to Federal bands in which Federal high power equipment is operated. That phase will examine effectiveness trade-offs of various regulatory and voluntary approaches and develop appropriate recommendations.
Existing standards were compiled and reviewed in order to categorize the various types of standards and associated regulatory frameworks. In the sections that follow, particularly the tables, concise examples of different types of receiver standards are provided. For application of a standard, the complete referenced document should be consulted.[11]
Section 2
TECHNICAL BACKGROUND
This report focuses on potential non-cochannel interference of an unwanted transmitter on a victim receiver, and the standards that recommend receiver design parameters to prevent that interference.
There are two modes whereby an undesired transmitter can interfere with a non-cochannel receiver. The first mode, usually regulated via limits on emissions outside the transmitter’s authorized bandwidth, involves unwanted emissions from the transmitter falling in the receiver’s tuned channel. The second mode involves several possible undesired responses of the receiver to the fundamental emissions in the transmitter’s tuned channel. These modes are generally independent, the former being dependent on the transmitter’s modulation and output filtering, and the latter on the receiver’s selectivity, dynamic range, and intermodulation rejection capability. It is this second mode that is the subject of this report.
These non-cochannel
interference mechanisms include:
·
feed through of non-cochannel signals to the
demodulator due to inadequate selectivity (filtering) at RF and IF stages;
·
blocking due to an undesired very strong signal
saturating the first amplifier stages and causing severe distortion
·
receiver desensitization resulting from
erroneous automatic gain control responses to non-cochannel signals;
·
gain compression due to inadequate RF
selectivity and dynamic range;
·
spurious responses (to non-cochannel signals
that mix with locally
generated signals and fall within the receiver passband); and
· intermodulation of the desired and non-cochannel signals or two or more non-cochannel signals in non-linear stages of a receiver (e.g., in connection with gain compression).
The definitions of terms used to specify receiver standards vary among standardization bodies, especially for technical definitions that describe the means for measuring compliance. Thus, the source documents and associated publications, as well as the IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms, ITU Recommendation SM.332-4, Selectivity of Receivers, and Federal Standard 1037C, Telecommunications: Glossary of Telecommunications Terms, should be consulted for proper interpretation and application of the standards. Following are generalized definitions for receiver parameters and other technical terms used in this report:
·
Adjacent Channel – A channel with bandwidth
equal to, and abutting the desired signal channel.
· Adjacent Channel Rejection (attenuation) – The ability of a receiver to reject signals in the adjacent channel.
· Adjacent Channel Selectivity – The ability of a receiver to discriminate between a desired signal and an undesired signal in an adjacent channel.
·
[BJ1]Blocking
– Saturation of the front end amplifier stage of a receiver by an undesired
signal on a frequency different from that of the desired signal, thereby
causing severe distortion and other non-linear effects that prevent proper
operation of the receiver. This is also
called the receiver saturation or blanking.
·
Cross Modulation – The appearance of modulation
from an unwanted signal on the desired signal.
·
Image Frequency (of a heterodyne receiver) – The
frequency removed from the local oscillator frequency, in the direction
opposite to the direction of the desired signal frequency, by an amount equal
to the intermediate frequency (i.e., difference between the desired channel
frequency and the local oscillator frequency).
·
Image Frequency Rejection – The ability of a receiver
to reject signals at the image frequency.
·
Intermodulation Rejection – The ability of a
receiver to reject intermodulation products produced by the mixing of two or
more signals at the input to the receiver.
·
Necessary Bandwidth – For a given class of
emission, the width of the frequency band which is just sufficient to ensure
the transmission of information at the rate and with the quality required under
specified conditions.
·
Non-Cochannel Signal – Any signal or portion of
a signal falling outside the authorized bandwidth of the desired signal.
·
Occupied Bandwidth – The width of a frequency
band such that, below the lower and above the upper frequency limits, the mean
powers emitted are each equal to a specified percentage β/2 of the total
mean power of a given emission. Unless
otherwise specified, the value of β/2 should be taken as 0.5%. β equals the percentage of power outside
the occupied bandwidth frequency limits.
·
Out-of-Band Emission – Emission on a frequency
or frequencies immediately outside the necessary bandwidth that result from the
modulation process, but excluding spurious emissions.
·
Selectivity – Rejection (attenuation) of an
undesired signal at frequencies close to the desired signal frequency. It is often specified as the amount of
frequency difference between desired and undesired signals needed to produce a
specified attenuation of the undesired signal.
·
Sensitivity Depression or Desensitization – The
level of a non-cochannel signal that increases a receiver signal power
threshold or decreases receiver gain by a defined amount.
·
Spurious Emission – Emission on a frequency or
frequencies which are outside the necessary bandwidth and the level of which
may be reduced without affecting the corresponding transmission of
information. Spurious emissions include
harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency
conversion products, but exclude out-of-band emissions.
·
Spurious Response – Undesired receiver response
resulting from mixing of the local oscillator and undesired signals. This includes the response to undesired
signals at the image frequency.
· Unwanted Emissions – Both spurious emissions and out-of-band emissions.
Section 3
FEDERAL AGENCY STANDARDS
NTIA
is responsible for managing Federal Government use of the radio spectrum. Its regulations, pertaining to Federal
Government use of the frequency spectrum, are contained in the Manual of Regulations and Procedures for
Federal Radio Frequency Management.[12]
[BJ2]The NTIA Manual provides receiver
standards for most fixed systems below 15 GHz, most mobile systems below 420
MHz, and most radar systems as shown in Table 1. Generally,
these standards include requirements for selectivity, spurious response
rejection, and intermodulation rejection.
These standards cover a large percentage of the authorized assignments
in the Government Master Frequency File,[13]
including the most congested Very High Frequency (VHF) and Ultra High Frequency
(UHF) bands.
|
Table 1. Summary of NTIA Receiver Standards |
||||
|
NTIA Manual Section |
Frequency Band |
Service |
Parameter |
Requirement |
|
3.9.7 |
162-174 MHz |
VHF Inter-national Boundary and Water Commission |
Selectivity |
90 dB |
|
Intermodulation
Rejection |
80 dB |
|||
|
Spurious &
Image Rejection |
100 dB |
|||
|
5.3.1 |
HF 3 – 30 MHz |
Fixed & Mobile |
Selectivity |
The pass band shall be no greater than the authorized bandwidth of emission and the slope of the selectivity outside the pass band shall be 100 dB/kHz |
|
5.3.3 |
406.1 - 420 MHz, 932-935/941-944 MHz, 1.71 - 15.35 GHz |
Fixed |
Spurious Rejection |
The receiver unwanted signals shall be attenuated at least 60 dB relative to the receiver sensitivity at the center of the pass band |
|
Selectivity |
The 3 dB receiver bandwidth should be commensurate with the authorized emission bandwidth plus twice the frequency tolerance of the transmitter. The 60 dB receiver bandwidth shall not exceed five times the 3 dB receiver bandwidth |
|||
|
Table 1. Summary of NTIA Receiver Standards (continued) |
||||
|
NTIA Manual Section |
Frequency Band |
Service |
Parameter |
Requirement |
|
5.3.5.1 |
29.7-50 MHz, 162-174 MHz, 406.1-420 MHz |
Fixed & Mobile (Wide Band) |
Spurious Rejection |
All exc. portable: 85 dB Portable: 50-60 dB (depending on band) |
|
Adjacent Channel
Rejection (Analog) |
All exc. portable: 80 dB Portable: 50-70 dB |
|||
|
Adjacent Channel
rejection (Digital) |
All exc. portable: 50-55 dB Portable: 50 dB |
|||
|
Intermodulation
Rejection |
All exc. portable: 60-70 dB Portable: 50 dB |
|||
|
5.3.5.2 |
138-150.8 MHz, 162-174 MHz, 406.1-420 MHz |
Fixed & Mobile (Narrow Band) |
Spurious Rejection |
All exc. portable: 70 dB Portable: 60 dB |
|
Adjacent Channel
Rejection |
All exc. portable: 60-70 dB Portable: 50-60 dB |
|||
|
Intermodulation
Rejection |
All exc. portable: 70 dB Portable: 50 dB |
|||
|
5.5.2 |
2.9-40 GHz |
Radars (Criteria B) |
Selectivity |
The overall receiver selectivity characteristics shall be commensurate with or narrower than the transmitter bandwidth |
|
Spurious
Rejection, excluding image |
50 dB, except where broadband front ends are required |
|||
|
Stability |
Frequency stability of receivers shall be commensurate with, or better than that of the associated transmitter |
|||
|
5.5.3 |
All Radar Bands |
Radars (Criteria C) |
Selectivity |
The overall receiver selectivity characteristics shall be commensurate with or narrower than the transmitter bandwidth. Receivers shall be capable of switching bandwidth limits to appropriate values whenever the transmitter bandwidth is switched |
|
Spurious
Rejection, excluding image |
60 dB |
|||
|
Image rejection |
50 dB |
|||
|
Stability |
Frequency stability of receivers shall be commensurate with, or better than that of the associated transmitter |
|||
|
5.5.4 |
2.7-2.9 GHz |
Radars (Criteria D) |
Selectivity |
The overall receiver selectivity characteristics shall be commensurate with or narrower than the transmitter bandwidth. Receivers shall be capable of switching bandwidth limits to appropriate values whenever the transmitter bandwidth is switched |
|
Spurious
Rejection, excluding image |
60 dB |
|||
|
Image Rejection |
50 dB |
|||
|
Stability |
Frequency stability of receivers shall be commensurate with, or better than that of the associated transmitter |
|||
|
Receiver
Interference Suppression Circuitry |
Radar systems should ha[BJ3][BJ4]ve provisions incorporated into the system to suppress pulsed interference. The following information is intended for use as an aid in the design and development of receiver signal processing circuitry or software to suppress asynchronous pulsed interference. A description of the parametric range of the expected environmental signal characteristics at the receiver IF output is: Peak I/N ratio:<50 dB Pulse width: 0.5 to 4.0 μs PRF: 100 to 2000 pps |
|||
|
5.5.5 |
449 MHz |
Radar (Criteria E, Wind Profiler Radars) |
Selectivity |
The 3 dB receiver bandwidth should be commensurate with the authorized emission bandwidth plus twice the transmitter frequency tolerance of 10 parts per million (ppm). The 60 dB receiver bandwidth shall be commensurate with the 60 dB emission bandwidth. Receivers shall be capable of switching bandwidth limits to appropriate values whenever the transmitter bandwidth is switched |
|
Spurious
rejection, excluding image |
60 dB |
|||
|
Image Rejection |
50 dB |
|||
|
EMC Provision |
Radars shall have the capability to tolerate incoherent pulsed interference of duty cycles less than 1.5 percent such that peak interfering signal levels 30 dB greater than the receiver noise level at the IF output will not degrade performance |
|||
|
8.2.29 |
156-162 MHz |
Maritime Mobile |
Adjacent Channel
Selectivity |
70 dB fixed 40 dB portable |
|
Spurious Rejection |
85 dB fixed 50 dB portable |
|||
|
Note: This table is a summary only. Reference should be made to the NTIA Manual for the full text of the standard. |
||||
The FCC is responsible for regulation of spectrum use by the private sector
and non-Federal agencies. Its
regulations are published in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Generally, the FCC has not
mandated receiver standards in the past.
Instead, it has relied on the market place to encourage manufacturers to
design receivers to whatever specifications are required for market place acceptance. Two exceptions have been in the area of
cable-ready television receivers and unlicensed devices authorized under FCC
Part 15 rules.
The FCC established the Spectrum Policy Task Force to study methods of improving spectrum management. This Task Force recommended that the FCC consider adopting receiver spectrum standards. The FCC has recently released a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) on this subject.[14]
Part 15.17 of the FCC rules, Radio Frequency Devices, has receiver standards pertaining to non-licensed devices. It advises parties responsible for equipment compliance to consider the proximity and the high power of non-government licensed radio stations, such as broadcast, amateur, land mobile, and non-geostationary mobile satellite feeder link earth stations, and U.S. Government radio stations, which could include high-powered radar systems, when choosing operating frequencies during the design of their equipment to reduce the susceptibility to receive harmful interference. Information on non-government use of the spectrum can be obtained by consulting the Table of Frequency Allocations in the FCC rules. Information on U.S. Government operations can be obtained by contacting the Director for Spectrum Plans and Policy within the National Telecommunications and Information Administration.[15]
This is an example of an approach to prevent interference, which is based on the expectation that manufacturers or operators characterize the electromagnetic environment in which the receiver will operate and develop appropriate voluntary standards or equipment specifications for receiver compatibility.
Part 15.118 of the FCC rules on cable ready consumer electronics equipment gives standards for receivers labeled as cable ready. It provides very detailed requirements and measurement methods for adjacent channel interference, image channel interference, direct pickup interference, and tuner overload.[16]
In another area, while not setting a standard, the FCC’s October 1984 Memorandum Opinion and Order for changes to rules related to educational FM stations recognized the work of the Electronic Industry Association/Consumer Electronics Group (EIA/CEG). The FCC acknowledges that it considers this work essential because insufficient information is now available to allow the drafting of standards for this service. The FCC recommends that the EIA Committee fill that void by providing guidance for improved receivers. The FCC emphasizes this point by stating that “if the industry, for whatever reasons, is unable or unwilling to set its own receiver standards, it may be necessary for the FCC to step in.” The Order further states that “the FCC may, upon review, determine that voluntary compliance by receiver manufacturers with EIA guidelines is appropriate, and we may be able to begin relaxing the assignment criteria as market penetration of the improved receivers expands.” [17] Ultimately, it could also decide to provide interference protection only to those receivers meeting minimum interference standards.
Receiver standards for the military are published by the U.S. Department of Defense. They pertain to all procurements by the various military departments. The primary DOD receiver spectrum standards are contained in two documents: MIL-STD 461E, Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment, and MIL-STD 469B, Radar Engineering Interface Requirement, Electromagnetic Compatibility.
MIL-STD 461E is the primary military standard relating to receiver spectrum standards.[18] The provisions of this standard primarily concern high-level radiation that may cause damage to the receiver, but Appendix A gives examples of various limits for different conditions for susceptibility to non-cochannel emissions. It includes a requirement to provide normal operation with an unwanted signal of 0 dBm outside of the tuning range of the receiver and also for an unwanted signal of 80 dB above the desired signal within the tuning range. There is also a cross modulation requirement for continued operation with a Carrier-to-Interference power ratio (C/I) of -66 dB. It also includes limits for bulk cable injection, power line interference, and general environmental levels. It provides detailed test procedures for measuring receiver parameters.
The second standard, MIL-STD 469B, contains receiver bandwidth, spurious responses, and image rejection for various classes of radars.[19] The standard and requirements are shown in Table 2. Many of these standards are derived from the NTIA standards.
Table 2. MIL-STD 469B Requirements for radar receivers
|
Radar category[20] |
Group[21] |
Requirements |
|
1 |
B, C, D |
The overall receiver selectivity characteristics shall be more narrow than the transmitter bandwidth described in tables IV, V, and VI[22] for the respective group. The minimum frequency range over which the receiver acceptance bandwidth and susceptibility requirements apply shall be the F MIN to F MAX range in table VI. |
|
1 |
B |
Receiver rejection of spurious responses, other than image responses, shall be 50 dB or better except where broadband front ends are required operationally. |
|
1 |
C, D |
Receivers shall be capable of switching bandwidth limits to appropriate values whenever the transmitter bandwidth is switched (pulse shape changed). Receiver image rejection shall be at least 50 dB; rejection of all other spurious responses shall be at least 60 dB. |
|
2 |
B,C |
The required acceptance bandwidth is the receiver acceptance bandwidth which includes the fundamental frequency response and extends from the lowest to the highest frequencies on the selectivity curve outside of which all other responses are at least 80 dB below the fundamental frequency response. Required acceptance bandwidths are listed: Type modulation Required acceptance bandwidth (MHz) Non-FM pulse
20/t FM pulse
20d/t CW 3 × 10 -4 Fo FM/CW 3 × 10 -4 Fo + Bd The radar receiver shall not exhibit any undesired response when subjected to signals outside the acceptance bandwidth. RF preselection shall be employed except where broadband front ends are required operationally. The requirement for broadband front ends will be determined by the contracting activity and incorporated into the equipment or subsystem request-for-proposal, specification, contract, or order. The minimum frequency range over which the receiver susceptibility characteristics apply shall be the F MIN to F MAX range in table VI for Category 2 radars. |
The Federal Aviation Administration is responsible for regulations pertaining to flight operations. For communications and navigation equipment, the FAA publishes Technical Standard Orders (TSOs) which refer to Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA) standards for their technical requirements.[23] Some of the TSOs are voluntary, at least for certain applications, and some are mandatory. For instance, in order to be identified with the applicable TSO marking, TSO-C32d prescribes that HF radio receiving equipment must meet the standards set forth in RTCA Document No. DO-163, Minimum Performance Standards - Airborne High Frequency Radio Communications Transmitting and Receiving Equipment Operating Within the Radio Frequency Range 1.5-30 Megahertz. [24] For their own receivers, the FAA uses procurement specifications for VHF/UHF AM Air/Ground Radio Communication Receivers. The specifications are given in Table 3.[25]
Table 3. FAA VHF/UHF AM Air/Ground Radio Communication Receiver Specifications
|
Parameter |
Requirement |
|
Selectivity, +/- 9 kHz |
6 dB |
|
Selectivity, +/- 25 kHz |
60 dB |
|
Spurious response rejection |
70 dB |
|
Desensitization |
80 dB |
|
Intermodulation rejection |
75 dB |
|
Cross Modulation rejection (+/- 0.5 MHz) |
70 dB |
|
Cross Modulation rejection (+/- 1.0 MHz) |
75 dB |
|
Cross Modulation rejection (+/- 1.5 MHz) |
80 dB |
The Department of Agriculture has requirements given in their Minimum Standard Specifications for Analog Only FM Land Mobile Radio Communications Equipment.[26] Test methods and definitions are based primarily on TIA/EIA–603–A, Land Mobile FM or PM Communications Equipment Measurements and Performance Standards but include additional limits. These specifications are given in Table 4, Table 5, and Table 6. [27] The Department of Agriculture specifications are unique because they have separate specifications for Economy, Standard, and High Performance equipment. This concept may also be applicable for the private sector because it could enable consumers to make purchase decisions based on required performance and cost.
Table 4. Department of Agriculture VHF Low-Band Receiver Specifications
|
Parameter |
Type |
Economy |
Standard |
High Perfor-mance |
|
Adjacent Channel Selectivity |
Portable |
70 dB |
N/A |
75 dB |
|
Mobile |
70 dB |
80 dB |
85 dB |
|
|
Base |
N/A |
85 dB |
85 dB |
|
|
Spurious Rejection |
Portable |
65 dB |
N/A |
70 dB |
|
Mobile |
80 dB |
80 dB |
90 dB |
|
|
Base |
N/A |
85 dB |
100 dB |
|
|
Intermod-ulation Rejection |
Portable |
60 dB |
N/A |
65 dB |
|
Mobile |
70 dB |
75 dB |
75 dB |
|
|
Base |
N/A |
75 dB |
75 dB |
|
|
Note: N/A = Not Applicable |
||||
Table 5. Department of Agriculture VHF High-Band Receiver Specifications
|
Parameter |
Type |
Wideband |
Narrowband |
||||
|
Economy |
Stan-dard |
High Perfor-mance |
Economy |
Stan-dard |
High Perfor-mance |
||
|
Adjacent Channel Selectivity |
Portable |
70 dB |
75 dB |
75 dB |
60 dB |
63 dB |
65 dB |
|
Mobile |
70 dB |
80 dB |
85 dB |
70 dB |
70 dB |
73 dB |
|
|
Base |
85 dB |
85 dB |
85 dB |
78 dB |
78 dB |
80 dB |
|
|
Aviation |
80 dB |
N/A |
N/A |
70 dB |
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
Spurious Rejection |
Portable |
70 dB |
70 dB |
75 dB |
70 dB |
70 dB |
75 dB |
|
Mobile |
80 dB |
80 dB |
90 dB |
80 dB |
80 dB |
80 dB |
|
|
Base |
80 dB |
85 dB |
100 dB |
80 dB |
85 dB |
100 dB |
|
|
Aviation |
85 dB |
N/A |
N/A |
80 dB |
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
Intermod-ulation Rejection |
Portable |
65 dB |
65 dB |
75 dB |
65 dB |
65 dB |
65 dB |
|
Mobile |
70 dB |
75 dB |
75 dB |
70 dB |
70 dB |
70 dB |
|
|
Base |
75 dB |
75 dB |
75 dB |
70 dB |
70 dB |
75 dB |
|
|
Aviation |
70 dB |
N/A |
N/A |
70 dB |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Table 6. Department of Agriculture UHF Receiver Specifications
|
Parameter |
Type |
Wideband |
Narrowband |
||||
|
Economy |
Stan-dard |
High Perfor-mance |
Economy |
Stan-dard |
High Perfor-mance |
||
|
Adjacent Channel Selectivity |
Portable |
70 dB |
N/A |
75 dB |
60 dB |
N/A |
65 dB |
|
Mobile |
70 dB |
80 dB |
85 dB |
70 dB |
70 dB |
73 dB |
|
|
Base |
75 dB |
85 dB |
85 dB |
75 dB |
78 dB |
80 dB |
|
|
Aviation |
80 dB |
N/A |
N/A |
70 dB |
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
Spurious Rejection |
Portable |
70 dB |
N/A |
75 dB |
70 dB |
N/A |
75 dB |
|
Mobile |
80 dB |
80 dB |
90 dB |
80 dB |
80 dB |
80 dB |
|
|
Base |
75 dB |
85 dB |
100 dB |
75 dB |
85 dB |
100 dB |
|
|
Aviation |
85 dB |
N/A |
N/A |
80 dB |
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
Intermod-ulation Rejection |
Portable |
65 dB |
N/A |
75 dB |
65 dB |
N/A |
65 dB |
|
Mobile |
70 dB |
75 dB |
75 dB |
70 dB |
70 dB |
70 dB |
|
|
Base |
70 dB |
75 dB |
75 dB |
70 dB |
70 dB |
75 dB |
|
|
Aviation |
70 dB |
N/A |
N/A |
70 dB |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Section 4
U.S. INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION STANDARDS
The Telecommunications Industry Association, in conjunction with the Electronic Industries Association (EIA), publishes recommended standards designed to serve the public interest through eliminating misunderstandings between manufacturers and purchasers, facilitating interchangeability and improvement of products, and assisting purchasers in selecting and obtaining with minimum delay, the proper products for their particular needs. Adherence to their standards, which is very widespread, is entirely voluntary. There is close coordination between TIA and the various international standards organizations. Some examples from their standards include the following:
TIA/EIA TSB 10-F, Interference Criteria for Microwave Systems provides a methodology and criteria for properly coordinating microwave systems in merged bands. This bulletin provides guidance and examples for interference protection and coordination in the microwave bands but it does not give specific receiver standards.[28]
TIA /EIA -690, Recommended Minimum Standards for 800 MHz Cellular Subscriber Units provides minimum standards for cellular subscriber units. It includes the receiver requirements shown Table 7.[29]
Table 7. TIA-690 Requirements for 800 MHz Cellular Subscriber Units
|
Parameter |
Requirement |
|
Adjacent channel rejection |
16 dB |
|
Semi-Adjacent channel rejection |
60 dB |
|
Intermodulation rejection |
55 dB |
|
Spurious Response Rejection |
60 dB |
TIA/ EIA–382–A, Minimum Standards - Citizens Band Radio Service Amplitude Modulated (AM) Transceivers Operating in the 27 MHz Band provides definitions, methods of measurement, and minimum standards for Citizens Band receivers. This standard includes requirements for receivers as shown in Table 8.[30]
Table 8. TIA-382-A Requirements for CB AM Transceivers in the 27 MHz Band
|
Parameter |
Requirement |
|
Adjacent channel rejection |
35 dB |
|
Alternate channel rejection |
35 dB |
|
Receiver desensitization immunity |
35 dB |
|
Spurious response rejection |
30 dB |
|
Cross Modulation rejection |
25 dB |
|
Intermodulation rejection |
40 dB |
|
Impulse Noise Limiter and Blanking |
10 dB |
TIA–603–A, Land Mobile FM or PM Communications Equipment Measurements and Performance Standards provides methods of measurements for receivers and gives detailed procedures on making measurements of adjacent channel rejection, offset channel selectivity, spurious response rejection, intermodulation rejection, and blocking rejection. This standard is widely referenced in the industry for methods of making measurements. This standard addresses Class B (standard performance) and Class A (high interference rejection) equipment as shown in Table 9. This is similar to the Department of Agriculture requirements for Economy, Standard, and High Performance equipment.[31]
Table 9. TIA-603-A Requirements for Land Mobile FM and PM Equipment
|
Type Service |
Response |
Applicable Channelization |
Fixed |
Mobile |
Portable |
|
Class A |
Adj Channel rejection |
>20 kHz |
75 dB |
75 dB |
70 dB |
|
Class B |
Adj Channel rejection |
>20 kHz |
70 dB |
70 dB |
60 dB |
|
Class A |
Adj Channel rejection |
15 kHz |
65 dB |
65 dB |
65 dB |
|
Class B |
Adj Channel rejection |
15 kHz |
60 dB |
60 dB |
60 dB |
|
Class A |
Adj Channel rejection |
12.5 kHz |
45 dB |
45 dB |
45 dB |
|
Class B |
Adj Channel rejection |
12.5 kHz |
40 dB |
40 dB |
40 dB |
|
Class A |
Spurious rejection |
N/A |
75 dB |
75 dB |
75 dB |
|
Class B |
Spurious rejection |
N/A |
70 dB |
70 dB |
60 dB |
|
Class A |
Intermodulation rejection |
N/A |
75 dB |
75 dB |
70 dB |
|
Class B |
Intermodulation rejection |
N/A |
70 dB |
70 dB |
50 dB |
|
All |
Offset channel selectivity |
N/A |
20 dB |
20 dB |
20 dB |
|
Class A |
Blocking Rejection |
N/A |
90 dB |
90 dB |
80 dB |
|
Class B |
Blocking Rejection |
N/A |
80 dB |
80 dB |
70 dB |
The CEA, in conjunction with the EIA, publishes standards related to consumer electronics. It has two standards applicable to receiver susceptibility: EIA/IS-31, Recommended Design Guideline, Rejection of Educational Interference to Channel 6 Television Reception, and EIA/IS-16-A, Immunity of Television Receivers and Video Cassette Recorders (VCRs) to Direct Radiation From Radio Transmissions, 0.5 to 30 MHz.
The first standard, EIA/IS-31, establishes design guidelines for color television receivers and Video Cassette Recorders (VCR’s) for providing rejection of educational and non-commercial Frequency Modulated (FM) broadcast interference.[32] It was prepared to permit more educational FM licenses to be awarded. It provides for three levels of desired television channel 6 reception with specific FM signals in the educational FM band of 88.1 to 91.9 MHz. It provides a chart plot of the undesired to desired signal power ratio that causes a noticeable level of interference vs. frequency offset of the FM channel from television channel 6.[33]
The second standard, EIA/IS-16-A, establishes performance guidelines for the immunity of television receivers and VCR’s to radio transmissions below 30 MHz and provides recommended measurement procedures. It was established in response to the large number of complaints by consumers of interference from amateur radio, citizens band and AM radiobroadcast stations to television receivers in the early days of television. It states that an AM broadcast, amateur radio, or Citizens Band (CB) signal of 1 volt per meter (V/m), or any other emission within the 0.5 to 30 MHz band of 0.3 V/m shall not cause noticeable interference to either the video or the audio of a television receiver.[34]
RTCA is an association of aeronautical organizations of the United States from both government and industry. It is dedicated to the advancement of aeronautics, seeking sound technical solutions to problems involving the application of electronics and telecommunications to aeronautical operations. The association’s objective is to resolve conflicts by mutual agreement of its member organizations. RTCA is not an official agency of the United States government and its recommendations may not be regarded as statements of official government policy unless so enunciated by the government organization or agency having statutory jurisdiction over any matters to which the recommendations relate. Many RTCA recommendations are indeed included in TSO’s of the FAA.
RTCA has numerous standards for avionics. Due to the critical nature and safety of flight issues related to aviation communication and navigation, RTCA standards are considerably more detailed than most other standards. Below is a representative sample of RTCA standards relating to receiver susceptibility to interference.
RTCA/DO-143 has requirements for sensitivity depression, cross modulation, and spurious response for receivers operated in the landing approach mode. There are also additional requirements for receivers operated in the enroute mode. As an example, requirements for sensitivity depression caused by out of band broadcast signals include requirements that the level of a standard test signal required to produce receiver threshold shall not increase more than 4 dB when there is added a channel 4 or 5 television signal having a level of 3.5 volts, and also that the level of a standard test signal required to produce receiver threshold shall not increase more than 4 dB when a 0.5 volt FM RF signal is present between 72.02 to 74.58 MHz and 75.42 to 75.98 MHz.[35]
RTCA/DO-177 has non-cochannel interference rejection standards that require that normal operational specifications shall be met in the presence of clear wave signals between 5000 MHz and 5250 MHz, at -55 dBW, excluding the band 5030 to 5091.7 MHz. Normal operational specifications shall also be met with interfering signals between 5250 MHz and 12.4 GHz at -20 dBm. Normal operational specifications shall also be met in the presence of C-Band weather radars in the 5350 to 5470 MHz band.[36]
RTCA/DO-179 applies to AM equipment operating in the Medium Frequency (MF) bands. It gives receiver selectivity requirements to be met in the presence of RF signal field strengths producing a defined receiver output at specified frequencies off resonance. Two criteria are given, one for simply being able to receive the non-directional beacon (NDB) audio, and the second for a maximum bearing error permitted in the automatic direction finding (ADF) mode as shown in Table 10. This standard also contains spurious response rejection requirements for signals from 50 kHz to 150 MHz as shown in Table 11 and cross modulation requirements as shown in Table 12.[37]
Table 10. RTCA DO-179 Selectivity requirements of for ADF Receivers
|
Carrier offset frequency |
NDB mode |
ADF mode |
|
0 kHz |
0 dB |
NA |
|
1 kHz |
0 dB |
-10 dB |
|
1.5 kHz |
6 dB |
-4 dB |
|
2 kHz |
12 dB |
2 dB |
|
3 khz |
27 dB |
17 dB |
|
4 kHz |
42 dB |
32 dB |
|
5 kHz |
57 dB |
47 dB |
|
6 kHz |
72 dB |
62 dB |
|
7 kHz |
>80 dB |
>70 dB |
Table 11. RTCA DO-179 Spurious Response requirements for ADF Receivers
|
Carrier tuning range |
Response attenuation |
|
190 – 850 kHz |
80 dB |
|
> 850 kHz |
60 dB |
Table 12. RTCA DO-179 Cross Modulation Requirements for ADF Receivers
|
Frequency Range |
Undesired modulated signal |
Desired unmodulated signal (µvolts per meter) |
|
50kHz - 550 kHz |
100 µvolts/meter - 0.2 volt/meter |
100 µvolts/meter - 0.2 volt/meter |
|
550 kHz – 150 MHz |
100 µvolts/meter - 1 volt/meter |
100 µvolts/meter - 0.2 volt/meter |
|
Note: µvolts = microvolts |
||
RTCA/DO186A is an example of a standard that goes into great detail. It defines six classes of receivers, depending on the channelization and the capability of offset carrier operation. Some of the specifications include the following requirements:[38]
Skirt Bandwidth (Selectivity)
Class A receivers utilize a 50 kHz channel separation environment having offset carrier operation. Class B receivers utilize the same separation environment but not having offset carrier operation. For these receivers the requirement is that at a frequency displaced by 43 kHz on either side of the assigned channel frequency, the level of an input signal required to produce reference Automatic Gain Control (AGC) voltage shall be at least 60 dB greater than the level required to produce reference AGC voltage at the assigned channel frequency.
Class C receivers utilize a 25 kHz channel separation environment having offset
carrier operation. For these receivers
the requirement is that at frequencies displaced by 17 and 25 kHz on either side of the assigned channel
frequency, the input signal level required to produce reference AGC voltage
shall be at least 40 dB and 60 dB
respectively, greater than the level required to produce reference AGC voltage
at the assigned channel frequency.
Class D receivers utilize a 25 kHz channel separation environment not having offset carrier operation. For these receivers the requirement is that at a frequency displaced by 22 kHz on either side of the assigned channel frequency, the input signal level required to produce reference AGC voltage shall be at least 60 dB greater than the level required to produce reference AGC voltage at the assigned channel frequency.
Class E receivers utilize a 8.33 kHz channel separation environment not having offset carrier operation.