On behalf of the Secretary of Commerce, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) has prepared this final report as required by Title VI -- Communications Licensing and Spectrum Allocation Improvement -- of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993. This report identifies radio spectrum currently used by the Federal Government for reallocation to the private sector.
Title VI requires the Secretary of Commerce to provide from the spectrum allocated for Federal use, an aggregate of at least 200 megahertz (MHz) for allocation by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to non-Federal users. This action is intended to benefit the public by promoting the development of new telecommunications technologies, products, and services that use the spectrum. As the first step in that process, NTIA prepared a Preliminary Spectrum Reallocation Report identifying candidate frequency bands for reallocation. That report, released on February 10, 1994, was submitted to the President, the Congress, and the FCC, and made available to the public, in accordance with Title VI.
The Preliminary Report was prepared using the Title VI requirements regarding the amount of spectrum to be provided, the degree of sharing permitted, and the timetable for reallocation. Thus, the Preliminary Report identified 50 MHz for immediate reallocation and proposed 150 MHz for delayed reallocation with an associated schedule.
Upon release of the Preliminary Report, a 90-day period was provided for public comment, followed by a second 90-day period in which the FCC prepared and submitted to the Secretary of Commerce a report, including an analysis of the public comments together with additional comments and recommendations. The table on page iv provides the final list of frequency bands identified for reallocation based on Title VI criteria, the Preliminary Report, comments from Federal agencies and the public, and the FCC Report.
The paragraphs below provide an overview of the reallocated bands, indicating the Federal usage, transition timetable, and any needed sharing requirements for each band identified for reallocation, and an overview of reported Federal implementation costs.
The radio spectrum allocated for Federal use, especially in bands below 5 GHz, is intensely used for a variety of purposes including support of the private sector. Identifying spectrum for reallocation involved consideration of two overriding and sometimes competing factors: (1) the impact on the Federal agencies, in terms of mission impact, costs, and potential reduction of services to the public, and (2) the benefits expected to be realized by the public. Taken in the aggregate, public comments on the Preliminary Report supported the process established in Title VI, and expressed interest in the following issues: reallocation of additional spectrum for a variety of new technologies; adoption of a more rapid reallocation schedule; and minimization of impact on existing non-Federal use of spectrum currently shared with Federal users.
Responses to the Preliminary Report from Federal agencies, however, raised significant concerns regarding operational impact and implementation costs, which are estimated to exceed $500 million. Significant impediment to the ability of Federal agencies to perform their missions and a reduction in services provided to the public were widely regarded as unacceptable tradeoffs. In complying with the requirements and band selection criteria of Title VI, this final spectrum reallocation plan establishes a reasonable balance between the spectrum needs of non-Federal users and those of the Federal Government.
====================================================================================================
[TABLE] Spectrum Reallocation Final Plan
===================================================================================================
Bands Identified
for Reallocation Reallocation Reallocation
(MHz)[a] Status[b] Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------
1390 - 1400 Exclusive January 1999
1427 - 1432 Exclusive January 1999
1670 - 1675 Mixed January 1999
1710 - 1755 Mixed January 1999/2004 [c]
2300 - 2310 Exclusive August 1995
2390 - 2400 Exclusive Reallocation Complete
2400 - 2402 Exclusive August 1995
2402 - 2417 Exclusive Reallocation Complete
2417 - 2450 Mixed August 1995
3650 - 3700 Mixed January 1999
4635 - 4660 Exclusive January 1997
4660 - 4685 Exclusive Reallocation Complete
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[a] 225 - 400 Although not a part of this reallocation plan, ongoing discussions within the
Federal Government regarding long range plans for the 225-400 MHz band
will address non-Federal spectrum requirements, including the views
expressed by the FCC in its upcoming report to Congress on the spectrum
needs of public safety agencies.
3625 - 3650 Expanded non-Federal use of the these bands
5850 - 5925 is being addressed jointly by NTIA and the FCC.
[b] Federal stations that will continue operation in certain bands are listed in Appendices E & F.
[c] Earlier availability date applies only to the 25 largest U.S. cities and is further subject to
timely reimbursement of Federal costs, including reimbursement directly from the private
sector. See Section 4 for details.
======================================================================================================
In reallocating these bands, several issues are of special importance: costs to Federal agencies, establishment of adequate receiver standards, adequate spectrum to which Federal agency operations can relocate, and implementation of appropriate Federal agency acquistion procedures so that the accelerated reallocation dates can be met. Title VI does not provide statutory authority for reimbursement of Federal agency costs associated with any reallocation of spectrum. However, the displaced Federal functions that result from spectrum reallocation must be preserved in other frequency bands at considerable cost to the Federal agencies. Reimbursement of Federal costs, including reimbursement directly from the private sector, will require Congressional legislation. Timely reimbursement is an essential element of the final plan for bands identified for accelerated reallocation.
Several bands identified for reallocation in the final plan are adjacent to bands that will continue to be used for high-power Federal systems, including megawatt radars. Numerous case histories exist where commercial or consumer radio systems received interference and failed to operate properly because of inadequate receiver filtering. In order to achieve the goals set by Title VI for development of new technologies, adoption of effective receiver standards, either regulatory or established by industry, is essential for bands identified in the final plan that are adjacent to high-power Federal systems.
Reallocating the entire 2400-2450 MHz band would provide the FCC with the opportunity to develop a long-term regulatory framework and strategy that meets the needs of the amateur service and addresses the requirements of a robust and growing Part 15 industry. Under a mixed use reallocation, the Federal allocation would be reduced to secondary, with the limited remaining Federal presence posing no impact on non-Federal use. This action creates a sense of stability regarding future non-Federal use and provides the opportunity to have a significant amount of spectrum for long-term development of non-licensed technologies. Furthermore, this would provide significant opportunities for innovators and small companies to make contributions to the overall mix of products and services available to the American public. We therefore include the 2400-2402 and 2417-2450 MHz bands for reallocation beginning in August 1995. The 2 MHz in the first band is proposed for exclusive non-Federal use and the 33 MHz in the second band is proposed for mixed Federal and non-Federal use.
Department of Agriculture $48 million
Department of the Army $33 million
Department of Commerce $35-55 million
Department of Energy $3-10 million
Department of Justice $144 million
Department of Treasury $1 million
Department of the Interior $8-13 million
Department of the Air Force $60 million [a]
Department of Transportation $115 million [a]
Department of the Navy $30-113 million [a]
[a] Costs could signigicantly increase if unacceptable interference to or from non-Federal systems
necessitates major hardware changes to Federal systems.